Primary bodycam recording
Privacy redactions: These sections are blacked out to protect the female passenger’s personal information.
7:08–7:44 (36 seconds): Home address.
8:40–8:49 (9 seconds): Personal telephone number.
Bodycam
Watch the full video presentation on YouTube. Individual MCSO recordings appear below, followed by Gallup Police recordings from the same response.
MCKINLEY COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE
Privacy redactions: These sections are blacked out to protect the female passenger’s personal information.
7:08–7:44 (36 seconds): Home address.
8:40–8:49 (9 seconds): Personal telephone number.
GALLUP POLICE · INCIDENT 2026-00027723
Video 1 is Keah-Tigh’s main-camera recording. The companion metadata names the source file beginning JacobKeahTigh-07-16-2026-12-27-01 and gives a local start of 06:27:01 Mountain Time on July 16. The public upright copy is the first recording linked above. Read its metadata.
The following elapsed-time cues come from the passenger’s September 15 review notes for that named source. They are navigation aids and paraphrases, not a verbatim transcript or an independent review of every word.
| Video 1 elapsed time | Passage identified in the review notes |
|---|---|
| About 16:25 | The bus driver photographs Shubham’s ticket. Review this passage when tracing the original photograph and its custody. |
| About 19:50–22:30 | The officer explains the decision about returning to the coach and Greyhound’s role in continued travel. The driver is present during part of this exchange. |
| About 24:30 | The driver spells the ticket-associated name. The review notes identify a difference from the name on the identification later used by law enforcement. |
Open Video 1 and its guide · Existing language-access passages · Outstanding ticket and travel questions
Video 2 is the separate Keah-Tigh recording titled Redaction_Mon_Aug_24_2026_26-27723_UPRIGHT.mp4. Video 3 is Bowman’s recording, titled 26-27723-1787610862.mp4. The Video 1 timestamps above must not be applied to either of those files.
GPD’s September 4 response said it had supplied its available recordings and officer notes, had not transferred records to MCSO, and had not been contacted by MCSO for records about this incident. That is a dated statement about the records handoff; it does not establish that no communication of any kind occurred or what happened afterward.
Read the September 4 response summary and source identification · Question 38: when were these records obtained and reviewed?