1. A specific allegation was reported.
The female passenger reported repeated unwanted touching involving her butt and private area. At 02:14 on Bittony’s bodycam, she answered “Four times.”
Start Here
THE 60-SECOND VERSION.
Five facts. Five receipts. Then decide whether you want the whole filing cabinet.
2. A translator was requested.
At 11:35, Shubham said, “Again, I need a translator.” Bittony acknowledged there was no translator and continued trying to question him.
3. The allegation became generic “touching.”
The recording contains six identified generic touching formulations before the first identified buttocks-specific formulation.
4. Alternative explanations and reassurances accumulated.
The timestamp review identifies ten alternative-explanation moments and nine reassuring or minimizing statements.
5. The Sheriff later called the investigation “sufficient.”
On August 21, Sheriff Maiorano said he reviewed Bittony’s report and video and concluded the investigation approved by Sgt. Benally was sufficient.
THE RECEIPTS: 6 / 10 / 9
When these counts are used on this site, the timestamped record stays with them.
6 TIMES THE ALLEGATION BECAME JUST “TOUCHING”
Bittony already knew the female passenger had reported multiple instances of touching of her butt and private area.
28:31 — “But the girl was saying that he was touching her butt.”
This is the first identified buttocks-specific description. The full allegation involving both her butt and private area still is not clearly presented to Shubham on the available recording.
This is the first identified buttocks-specific description. The full allegation involving both her butt and private area still is not clearly presented to Shubham on the available recording.
10 INNOCENT-EXPLANATION MOMENTS
WHY IT MATTERS
The issue is not that an investigator considered innocent possibilities. It is who supplied those possibilities, when they were supplied, and what happened when Shubham rejected or failed to support them.
The issue is not that an investigator considered innocent possibilities. It is who supplied those possibilities, when they were supplied, and what happened when Shubham rejected or failed to support them.
9 REASSURANCES
FIVE SECONDS APART
34:47 — “You’re not going to go to jail.”
34:52 — “I have to gather all the evidence to put it together into a report.”
34:47 — “You’re not going to go to jail.”
34:52 — “I have to gather all the evidence to put it together into a report.”