Independent accountability project. Not affiliated with MCSO, McKinley County, James Maiorano III, or any political campaign.
Bodycam
FOLLOW THE RECORDING IN CONTEXT.
The clips and timestamp sections elsewhere on the site should be treated as guides into the complete available recording, not substitutes for it.
REDACTED BODYCAM STILL
SCENE VIDEO
BENALLY VIDEOKey sections
02:14
Bittony asks, “Once, twice?” The female passenger answers, “Four times.”
11:35
Shubham: “Again, I need a translator.”
11:43
Bittony acknowledges there is no translator and says he is going to try to talk to him.
11:46
Bittony says Shubham must understand because he is “arguing.”
17:06
Shubham denies arguing and says he speaks “little bit” of English.
18:07
A question about where the bus came from is misunderstood as a question about where Shubham is from.
18:42
Shubham: “I’m not speak proper English.”
20:00
Shubham again says he does not speak proper English.
20:12–27:27
Six generic “touching” formulations identified in the project timestamp review.
25:40
Bittony demonstrates a possible accidental hand movement. Shubham rejects it.
28:31
First identified reference to even the buttocks portion of the allegation.
34:47
“You’re not going to go to jail.”
34:52
“I have to gather all the evidence to put it together into a report.”
38:37–41:28
Financial-motive and insurance-fraud discussion.
Privacy: only the already-redacted agency video segments are public while the complete playback receives an additional privacy review.
Complete playback copy
The public link is temporarily withheld while names, voices, and non-official faces are reviewed for privacy.
PRIVACY REVIEW IN PROGRESS
Timestamp key
OPEN TIMESTAMP KEY →
Auto-transcript
Navigation aid, not a substitute for the recording.
OPEN VTT →
THE RECEIPTS: 6 / 10 / 9
When these counts are used on this site, the timestamped record stays with them.
6 TIMES THE ALLEGATION BECAME JUST “TOUCHING”
Bittony already knew the female passenger had reported multiple instances of touching of her butt and private area.
20:12
“She said that you were touching her.”
20:18
“With your hand. Touching her?”
21:52
“Why would she say you were touching her?”
25:32
“You didn’t touch her? Maybe you were sleeping.”
27:20
“The female is saying that he was touching her.”
27:27
“Why does that lady say he’s touching her?”
28:31 — “But the girl was saying that he was touching her butt.”
This is the first identified buttocks-specific description. The full allegation involving both her butt and private area still is not clearly presented to Shubham on the available recording.
10 INNOCENT-EXPLANATION MOMENTS
1. 18:19
“You don’t know? You were sleeping, maybe?”
Sleep explanation supplied by Bittony.
2. 21:20
“She was moving all over the place?”
Movement explanation supplied by Bittony.
3. 21:38
“She’s just moving around all over?”
Movement explanation reinforced by Bittony.
4. 21:44
“Does she get in your space, in your seat?”
Shubham: “No. I’m sitting this in my area only.”
Seat-space explanation supplied by Bittony. Rejected by Shubham.
5. 22:14
“Maybe your bag?”
Shubham indicates his bag was positioned in front of his seat.
Bag explanation supplied by Bittony.
6. 25:32
“You didn’t touch her? Maybe you were sleeping.”
Sleep explanation reintroduced by Bittony.
7. 25:40
“Maybe you were sleeping and your hand like this?”
Bittony physically demonstrates the accidental hand movement he is suggesting.
Shubham: “No, no, no.”
Accidental-contact explanation supplied and demonstrated by Bittony. Rejected by Shubham.
8. 28:38
“She kept moving around.”
Movement explanation reintroduced by Bittony.
9. 29:10
“When she was moving around, did she move into his space?”
Seat-space explanation supplied by Bittony.
The civilian assisting with translation responds: “He just listen to music.”
That response does not support Bittony’s suggestion that she moved into Shubham’s space.
10. 29:31
Bittony asks again: “Did she move into his space?”
The civilian assisting with translation, not Shubham, initially answers: “Yeah.”
Bittony immediately repeats the proposition.
The subsequent response contains:
“No.”
“Only in her space.”
“her seat.”
The “Yeah” did not come from Shubham. The seat-space explanation originated with Bittony, not from an unsolicited account by Shubham.
WHY IT MATTERS
The issue is not that an investigator considered innocent possibilities. It is who supplied those possibilities, when they were supplied, and what happened when Shubham rejected or failed to support them.
9 REASSURANCES
22:43
“It doesn’t mean you’re going to jail with me.”
31:17
“So he’s not going to be arrested or anything like that.”
31:52
“He’s not going to be arrested. It’s just I’m going to do a report.”
34:47
“He’s not in trouble with me.”
34:47
“You’re not going to go to jail.”
36:34
“Then it’s nothing.”
36:46
“Just don’t think about it too much.”
41:01
“It’s okay, man. You’re going to be okay.”
41:12
“Yeah. It’s unfortunate, but you’ll be fine.”
FIVE SECONDS APART
34:47 — “You’re not going to go to jail.”
34:52 — “I have to gather all the evidence to put it together into a report.”